Last year, I managed to wake myself up early enough to see the first sunrise of the year ,
because I managed to convince myself that it was "research" for writing my fanfic. This is a Japanese custom known as Hatsuhi (初日 - literally "first day"), where people will go outside, often together, to catch the first rays of light of the new year. I didn't have a blog last year to share this on, but I did write an account in an email to a friend.
If you did watch the Rose Parade [in 2013], you may have noticed
that it was not particularly sunny, but the weather wasn't bad -- just a
broken altostratus deck. So there was a good chance that I would see new sun as it shed the first light on the new year.
I woke up at around 6:50, and threw on a flannel shirt over my
flannel pajamas. When I first woke up, the sky was still dark enough
that I could see a couple of planets, but dark clouds obscured most
everything but the bright gibbous moon. I got out a ladder and set it
up against the house -- the lightest part of the sky was behind the
orange tree, so I had to climb up to get a better view.
The black shingle of the roof was cold to the touch, but the wind
was calm, and I still warm from bed. I ambled up the the apex of the
garage, so as not to wake anyone up, and turned towards the eastern
sky. There were still a lot of trees -- more than I had thought there
were in my neighborhood -- but it was obvious from the clouds that I
wasn't going to see sunrise directly. The appointed time, 7:03, came
and went, with only a slight brightening of the eastern sky. Of course,
I thought -- the sun's gotta rise above the Santa Monica Mountains. I
did a quick calculation: 3° above the horizon is about 10 minutes -- and
settled down to wait.
A pair of crows joined me on a nearby power line, staring eastward
too. The sky started to brighten as the sunlight filtered to the
bottom of the clouds, and suddenly the gloomy sky was replaced with a
warm glow. Everything started to come alive, and the finches started
singing their calls, telling all of the other birds, "Hark, awaken, for a
new day has come, everyone be excited. I'm going to tweet to everyone I
know, Happy New Year! Hey everyone, wake up!" And then of course,
they stopped, because everyone knows only 140 characters can fit into a
tweet.
The crows, whom by this point I had nicknamed Phobos and Deimos,
awaited the sunrise. And then, finally, the bottom of the clouds at the
horizon was lined with a golden glow. And, that was it. Phobos cawed
to Deimos, "Huh, is that it?" They looked on for a moment more, before
the reply came from Deimos, "Yeah, I guess that's all it's gonna be."
Some crows in the large ficus behind us called out, and my crow friends
departed to join their friends for the day.
But, I had gotten up especially for this, so I was undeterred. It
looked like a break in the clouds was up a little bit further, and I was
definitely going to catch the first rays of sun. A man passed by,
walking a dog, disturbing the canine living next door. I took the
chance to look at the hills, and the sky, and the strip of ocean to the
south. Things really do look different from up high, so I took in the
view of the house's roofs as a pair of house finches zoomed by me.
And then, ten minutes later, the sun finally broke through the
clouds -- well -- partially. It was still obscured by the clouds, so I
couldn't see the golden disk. But I saw a bright enough glow to etch
the afterimage into my eyes. I blinked, and the image of the sun's
light through the clouds formed a shape that looked exactly like this:
^_^ The sun had smiled upon my weeaboo endeavor, and blessed me with
an Asian smiley for the new year. And with that, I accepted the
blessing and headed back down to a warm bed.
Tuesday, December 31, 2013
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
The Edge of the Creative Commons
As you may or may not be aware, last year I left TV Tropes (TVT) on unfriendly terms. I may have been banned, but the feeling was certainly mutual. I felt that the TV Tropes policy on keeping things "family friendly" had gone to a ludicrous extreme, eliminating academic discussion of things that made administrators and advertisers uncomfortable. I was not alone in leaving TVT. I was banned for noting that their "panel of people who determine what content is appropriate" is in fact a "Censorship Panel" -- but others just saw the way that the wind was blowing and left.
When I left, I wanted to leave open the possibility of forking the project, so I did a low-speed crawl of the website, that gathered up source pages, and did under 200,000 requests over the course of seven days. I hadn't really planned on running a wiki, but I wanted to gather content before it was all censored and/or deleted.
At that time, the wiki had a message in the footer:
I don't believe that this move was, in fact, legal. The barrier to editing, the "Getting Known" page, was, in its entirety:
I simply assumed, that as an editor of a wiki that displays a CC-BY-SA license, that my content would be distributed under those terms. As the EFF notes, posting something online can come with an implied license to distribute the content under the terms stated on the website. I don't dispute that. I granted an implied license (and hereby explicit) to distribute all content I wrote on tvtropes.org under a CC-BY-SA 3.0 license.
But I did not grant them any ability to change that license. And when you distribute CC licensed content outside the terms of the license, their license to use your work -- and all derivative works -- is terminated.
As I got around to launching a new wiki to compete with TV Tropes, these issues came back into the foreground. People started asking if we could copy over content from TV Tropes. And the answer was not "no, they're using a different license from us"; instead we told people "no, because we cannot be sure that the content is not copyright infringement".
This sparked a reaction over at TV Tropes. Someone asked about the license in this thread. Then, on On November 11, 2013, one of their administrators posted this on the Administrivia/Welcome To TV Tropes page:
I could just send a DMCA request, requesting that they take down all of the pages that I edited -- and all revisions thereafter, because they're derivatives of my work. This is how CC-BY-SA works. And, as I said earlier, the CC license infringement terminates the CC license. Legal action by myself and my allies could take out a huge swath of the TVT wiki. But I didn't start a wiki to get into the content deletion business, so this idea makes me very uncomfortable.
At the same time, they are violating the rights of hundreds of writers on the site, by claiming ownership without even telling them. There is still nothing in user registration that announces their "we own your work, so don't expect to ever profit from it" policy. The page editor says that the site has a CC-BY-SA-NC license, but do not actually ask users to place their edits under this license. Users are never directed to any kind of Terms of Service. They do The Wrong Thing at every step of the way.
So if I don't stand up for these people, who will? If a website is allowed to transition from Creative Commons to private ownership, that undermines the entire structure of the information commons.
In fact, their actions undermine the stability of both of our wikis. Because only got an implicit license to distribute content -- and make multiple claims about what said implicit license means -- it undermines faith in the older CC-BY-SA license that we use to distribute data. All The Tropes' license could be held invalid because of the outrageous claims coming from TV Tropes.
The legal situation for TV Tropes, however, is far worse. Unlabled mixes of CC-BY-SA and CC-BY-NC-SA content are copyright infringement. Period. If an editor agrees to relicense his content under the new license, that's legal. If we transfer ownership to TVT, that would be legal. But I certainly haven't done either, and neither have my colleagues at All The Tropes. So all pages that I edited which are still distributed at TVT are infringing. All editors of those pages may also be copyright infringers, because they release a revision under CC-BY-NC-SA. The weird mixed licensing situation at TVT is simply not tenable.
All The Tropes and TV Tropes are in a Mutually Assured Destruction situation, and I don't see a way out of it. I am not a lawyer; maybe it's about time I hired one.
When I left, I wanted to leave open the possibility of forking the project, so I did a low-speed crawl of the website, that gathered up source pages, and did under 200,000 requests over the course of seven days. I hadn't really planned on running a wiki, but I wanted to gather content before it was all censored and/or deleted.
At that time, the wiki had a message in the footer:
This wiki is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.That was before I told a forum that I had done a siterip. Fearing that I might use this data to fork the wiki, the TV Tropes website unilaterally changed it's license to the CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0, adding the NonCommercial clause to the license. Note that these are not compatible licenses -- CC-BY-SA derivatives must be CC-BY-SA licensed; CC-BY-NC-SA derivatives must be CC-BY-NC-SA licensed. They never asked the wiki editor's consent to make the change. This happened in July of 2012.
I don't believe that this move was, in fact, legal. The barrier to editing, the "Getting Known" page, was, in its entirety:
Being known on the wiki means that the software is aware of your wiki handle (user name). It reserves the use of your handle for you, and provides some services to known people that are not available to completely anonymous folks. Posting and editing are reserved for people 13 years of age or older. By posting or editing here, you are stating that you are at least 13 years old.Looking over that, I never granted TV Tropes any rights to relicense content that I wrote. I never granted them any explicit license, in fact.
Handle:
(spaces will be removed)
Password:
(passwords are case sensitive)
Create Know-age!
You can also use this form to just set/reset your cookie on this machine, if you are already known. Put your handle and password in the boxes above and press:
Already Known. Just bake a new cookie.
Quick link to You know, that thing where ...
"Well, duh," you are thinking. "It's a user account." Not exactly. We don't bug you for an email address. Using this form is the entire process. We do need to put a cookie on your system, so you'll have to allow that. You will be logged in on the machine you are using now automatically, unless something happens to the cookie.
I simply assumed, that as an editor of a wiki that displays a CC-BY-SA license, that my content would be distributed under those terms. As the EFF notes, posting something online can come with an implied license to distribute the content under the terms stated on the website. I don't dispute that. I granted an implied license (and hereby explicit) to distribute all content I wrote on tvtropes.org under a CC-BY-SA 3.0 license.
But I did not grant them any ability to change that license. And when you distribute CC licensed content outside the terms of the license, their license to use your work -- and all derivative works -- is terminated.
As I got around to launching a new wiki to compete with TV Tropes, these issues came back into the foreground. People started asking if we could copy over content from TV Tropes. And the answer was not "no, they're using a different license from us"; instead we told people "no, because we cannot be sure that the content is not copyright infringement".
This sparked a reaction over at TV Tropes. Someone asked about the license in this thread. Then, on On November 11, 2013, one of their administrators posted this on the Administrivia/Welcome To TV Tropes page:
By contributing content to this site, whether text or images, you grant TV Tropes irrevocable ownership of said content, with all rights surrendered ...Well...! I definitely did not expect that. The TV Tropes administration has the cojones to not only assert ownership over my writing and relicense it, they also claim the authority to delete the evidence of the deed. I guess they already violated the ShareAlike clause, so they might as well violate the Attribution one as well. All while claiming to be a site honoring writers. This is beyond the pale.
We are not required to attribute content you contribute to you, nor do you retain ownership of anything you contribute. Anything you contribute may be deleted, modified, or used commercially by us without notification or consent, to the extent permitted by applicable laws. For that reason, we strongly recommend that you do not post material on our site, whether in text or image form, that you wish to receive commercial benefit from in the future.
I could just send a DMCA request, requesting that they take down all of the pages that I edited -- and all revisions thereafter, because they're derivatives of my work. This is how CC-BY-SA works. And, as I said earlier, the CC license infringement terminates the CC license. Legal action by myself and my allies could take out a huge swath of the TVT wiki. But I didn't start a wiki to get into the content deletion business, so this idea makes me very uncomfortable.
At the same time, they are violating the rights of hundreds of writers on the site, by claiming ownership without even telling them. There is still nothing in user registration that announces their "we own your work, so don't expect to ever profit from it" policy. The page editor says that the site has a CC-BY-SA-NC license, but do not actually ask users to place their edits under this license. Users are never directed to any kind of Terms of Service. They do The Wrong Thing at every step of the way.
So if I don't stand up for these people, who will? If a website is allowed to transition from Creative Commons to private ownership, that undermines the entire structure of the information commons.
In fact, their actions undermine the stability of both of our wikis. Because only got an implicit license to distribute content -- and make multiple claims about what said implicit license means -- it undermines faith in the older CC-BY-SA license that we use to distribute data. All The Tropes' license could be held invalid because of the outrageous claims coming from TV Tropes.
The legal situation for TV Tropes, however, is far worse. Unlabled mixes of CC-BY-SA and CC-BY-NC-SA content are copyright infringement. Period. If an editor agrees to relicense his content under the new license, that's legal. If we transfer ownership to TVT, that would be legal. But I certainly haven't done either, and neither have my colleagues at All The Tropes. So all pages that I edited which are still distributed at TVT are infringing. All editors of those pages may also be copyright infringers, because they release a revision under CC-BY-NC-SA. The weird mixed licensing situation at TVT is simply not tenable.
All The Tropes and TV Tropes are in a Mutually Assured Destruction situation, and I don't see a way out of it. I am not a lawyer; maybe it's about time I hired one.
Labels:
allthetropes,
copyright,
creative commons,
tropes,
tvtropes,
wiki
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)